With Sadness I oppose Proposition 61

Here is what Proposition 61 would do.

Black Votes Count Too
Black Votes Count Too!

It would prohibit all state agencies from buying prescription medications at any price higher than the lowest price paid, for the same drug, by the US Department of Veterans Affairs. This rule would apply to drugs bought directly by the state agency, or when the agency is the ultimate payer for the medication, even if the agency does not directly buy the medication.

This sure seems like a good idea. According to the Non-Partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office (an agency housed in the state legislature) the state of California spent $3.8 billion on prescription medications in fiscal year 2014-2015. The savings to the state could be considerable, although the Legislative Analyst’s Office said it was unable to estimate just how much at this time.

So, why shouldn’t we vote for proposition 61?

The problem is that those savings are likely to come at the expense of the rest of us.

Almost certainly, the drug companies will compensate for this loss of income by charging more to everyone else.

Congress barred Medicare from negotiating drug prices. According to the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in 2015, over 39 million Americans were enrolled in Medicare Part D. Part D is the program that helps seniors pay for prescription medications. Since Medicare can’t bargain on medication prices, it will pay more for drugs, and probably the Part D premiums paid by seniors will go up.

Insurance companies that pay for the drugs used by their customers can bargain on price with the drug manufacturers. But those manufacturers will bargain harder to get higher prices for the drugs. Ultimately that would probably result in higher insurance premiums.

And people without health insurance, or Medicare or Medicaid (Medi-Cal in California) will be out of luck. They will just have to pay whatever the drug companies demand.

According to US Bankruptcy Court records, more than 1.5 million people file for bankruptcy each year. An according to research done by Harvard University 62% of those bankruptcies resulted from overwhelming medical expenses. Even more interesting, 72% of those who filed bankruptcies because of medical bankruptcies DID HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. Increases in the cost of drugs would make things even worse.

Bernie Sanders proposed the best solution to all of this, Medicare for all. If Medicare was allowed to negotiate with drug companies, and it covered everyone, it would be negotiating for everyone. Everyone would benefit from the lower drug prices.

Proposition 61 helps only the state Government of California and those Californians covered by Medi-Cal. It does nothing for any other Californians or for people across this nation. In fact it could make things worse for the rest of us. Sadly, we must vote NO on Proposition 61.


Just click on the words “Leave A Comment” at the bottom of this post and type in your comment. If instead of “Leave A Comment,” you see the word “Comments” with a number in front of it, click on that word “Comments”, scroll down to and click on “Leave A Reply.” Any and all responses will be welcome, as long as they are respectful and do not promote hate.

If you like what you read, you can subscribe to the blog and get E-mail notifications whenever I add a new post to the blog. That will enable you to go to the blog and read the latest post. To subscribe, click on the green “Follow” button on the left side near the top of this post.

Please tell your friends about this blog and encourage them to visit it at: 4justiceturnleft.org


2 thoughts on “With Sadness I oppose Proposition 61

  1. Oh, my. But Bernie Sanders and AARP encourage a YES vote on 61. I haven’t looked at the details of that support, but it surely does make me wonder. And the major OPPOSITION to 61 by big drug companies “Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and other companies” really makes me lean toward supporting it. If Big Pharma opposes something, I probably support it!


    1. Hi Ruthie,

      You make good points. And I respect both AARP and Bernie Sanders. I also respect the California Council of Churches, IMPACT and they support Proposition 61. I certainly respect your views as well.

      But I’m an ornery kind of guy. I try to take a look at the facts and make up my own mind. I think the facts described in my post support the idea that we should vote no on proposition 61

      A fact I did not mention is the recently announced premium increases on Obama Care. They are going up, an average of 25%. Four states are expecting increases of 30% or more. Alaska is expecting an average in crease of 39.1%, while in Minnesota it probably will be 47.7%.

      Why do the drug companies oppose Prop 61? The income they get from California purchases of drugs are settled. They don’t have to fight for it. If Prop 61 passes they will try to replace their lost income from the other sources mentioned in my post. But they will have to fight and bargain hard for it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s